Gray Calls out Water Board for Claim that Contaminating Drinking Water in Disadvantaged Communities is not “Significant”

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

(Sacramento) – Assemblymember Adam C. Gray (D-Merced) ripped the State Water Resources Control Board yesterday for arguing that the harm caused by the Bay-Delta Plan to the drinking water of disadvantaged communities is not “significant”. Gray’s comments came as his legislation, Assembly Bill 637, cleared the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee with bipartisan support.

 

In response to criticism that the Bay-Delta Plan ignores impacts to disadvantaged communities, the State Water Board issued a master response arguing that because the board is not a federal agency it does not have to consider impacts to these communities significant.

 

“The State Water Board should play by the same rules that the federal government has followed since 1994 when President Clinton issued an executive order prohibiting federal agencies from discriminating against and ignoring impacts to low income and minority communities,” said Gray. “Any rational person would agree that advancing a plan which devastates impoverished neighborhoods, degrades drinking water, and openly ignores impacts to some of the most vulnerable communities in the state should be against the law – but the Water Board is not rational.”

 

AB 637 requires the State Water Board to identify disadvantaged communities and mitigate impacts to the drinking water supplies serving those communities. The bill also requires the Board to hold public hearings in or near impacted communities.

 

“It took demands from nearly the entire delegation of Northern San Joaquin Valley lawmakers before the State Water Board agreed to hold public hearings on the Bay-Delta Plan in the impacted communities of Merced, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin counties,” continued Gray. “It should be the rule – not the exception – that impacted communities are able to make their voices heard.”

 

“As the new administration and our irrigation districts continue working towards securing voluntary agreements, this is a reminder of the distrust sowed by the State Water Board up to this point,” finished Gray.

 

AB 637 has significant support from organizations throughout the 21st Assembly District including:

 

 

 

  • Ceres Unified School District
  • City of Livingston
  • City of Patterson
  • Great Merced Chamber of Commerce
  • Le Grand Union High School District
  • Los Banes Unified School District
  • Mayor of Gustine Patrick Nagy
  • Merced City School District
  • Merced County Farm Bureau
  • Merced County Office of Education
  • Merced River School District
  • Merced Union High School District
  • Opportunity Stanislaus
  • Planed Elementary School
  • Stanislaus County
  • Winton School District

 

 

More information on Assembly Bill 637 can be found here.